PFwise.com
Search
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Tools
  • Know-how
    • Insurance 101
    • Annuity 101
    • College Planning
    • Real Estate
    • Retirement Planning
    • Smart Investment
    • Stock Ideas
    • Tax Planning
  • About Us
  • 中文
  • Resources
    • Personal Finance Reading List
    • Financial Aid Resources
    • Personal Finance Calendar
    • Retirement Planning Calendar
    • ETF list
    • Financial Glossary
  • Newsletters Archive

How Often Should I Rebalance My Investment Portfolio?

3/1/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Q. How often should I balance my portfolio?

A. We already had a blog post discussing the frequency of rebalancing one's portfolio that depends on one's investment stage.

MarketWatch had an article from an author who did two back date testings comparing the following hypothetical people: Mr. Lazy, who never rebalances, Ms. Birthday, who rebalances once a year, Mr. Quarter, who rebalances every three months, and Miss Monthly, who, as her name suggests, rebalances every month.

Here are the two tests and the end results:

=============
Test 1.

The first portfolio was spread equally across five asset classes: U.S. stocks, stocks of developed economies overseas such as Europe and Japan, emerging market stocks, inflation-protected U.S. Treasury bonds, and long-term regular U.S. Treasury bonds. Someone holding this portfolio has a balance of 60% stocks and 40% bonds; the stocks are highly diversified across three major global groupings; and the bonds are split between those which are protected against inflation and the long-term bonds which are most valuable in a market panic or sell-off, when they (unlike everything else) tend to go up.

To run the experiment I used the portfolio service offered by Lipper, Inc., a fund-analysis service owned by Thomson Reuters. For the sake of illustration I built the portfolio using five Vanguard funds: Vanguard Total Stock Market Index VTSMX, Vanguard Developed Market Index VDMIX, Vanguard Emerging Market Stock Index VEIEX, Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities VIPSX and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury VUSTX.

I started the experiment in June 2000, the earliest date from which all five funds were available, and continued to the present.

Bottom line? Mr. Lazy did worst. Mr. Quarter did best. Miss Monthly could have saved herself a lot of bother. Not only did she do worse than Mr. Quarter, but she even did worse than Ms. Birthday.


Test 2.

For a second experiment, I looked at how the same four investors would have fared over a longer period of time. Once again using Lipper, I imagined that each of the four started with $100,000 20 years ago, in 1994. And I imagined that in each case they built a portfolio spread equally between three assets: U.S. stocks, emerging market stocks, and the bond market. (I used the Vanguard Total Stock, Emerging Market Stock, and Bond Market Index funds, three funds which existed throughout that period and for which data are available).

Bottom line? The results were pretty much in line with the first experiment. Mr. Quarter did best. Mr. Lazy did worst, although once again not quite as badly as you might have expected. Miss Monthly could have saved herself her time and energy. She did worse than Ms. Birthday.

Going back over 20 years, we really are delving into ancient history. In 1994, Barings had yet to go bankrupt. The Internet was in its early stages. Google hadn’t even been invented, and Amazon was in its infancy. Your correspondent was considered on the cutting edge because he read news online, on a black screen, using a 14.4k dial up modem. The Asian Tigers were only just getting going on their massive bubble of the mid-1990s.

How did these portfolios fare?

Mr. Lazy saw his $100,000 investment swell to $405,000 — a remarkable sum for no work. Miss Monthly ended up with $441,000. Ms. Birthday ended with $445,000. But Mr. Quarter trumped them all, finishing with $459,000. That’s $54,000 more than his super-lazy counterpart.

Mr. Lazy earned 7.2% a year with no effort at all. Mr. Quarter earned just under 8%.

I should add that the drawdowns—the sharpest falls from peak to trough—were comparable across all four portfolios.

The results are reasonably intuitive. They support the suspicion that paying too much attention to the market, by rebalancing every month, is almost as bad as paying too little. But they do suggest that a certain amount of activity pays rewards.



=============================

The Bottom Line

If you add transaction costs and short term tax impact, plus considering the emotional pain one suffers when engaged in frequent rebalancing, it's safe to say Mr. Lazy ends up as the biggest winner!

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    PFwise's goal is to help ordinary people make wise personal finance decisions.

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013

    Categories

    All
    Annuity
    Book Reviews
    College Finance
    Finance In Formula
    Financial Scams
    For Entrepreneurs
    Healthcare
    Insurance
    Investment
    Miscellaneous
    Real Estate
    Retirement
    Savings
    Savings Ideas
    Stock-ideas
    Tax
    Tax-related

    RSS Feed

Copyright © 2013 - 2022 PFWise.com, All Rights Reserved. 
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
PFwise.com does not provide investment, tax, or legal advice. The information presented here is not specific to any individual's personal circumstances.

To the extent that any material concerns tax matters, it is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by law. Each taxpayer should seek independent advice from a tax professional based on his or her individual circumstances.

These materials are provided for general information and educational purposes based upon publicly available information from sources believed to be reliable—we cannot assure the accuracy or completeness of these materials. The information in these materials may change at any time and without notice.
About Us | Contact Us 
中文